![]() just trying to figure out how to create examples to see how much scope would be needed for both large canvas work etc. ![]() ![]() I realize this is more of a yes or no question. (Partial reply as I've been struggling to get some images together to help illustrate my point, but do not wish to seem rude by letting this drag on.) If that's true, I could increase the ranges in the next version. a blur radius of 100 pixels), I'm thinking you'd get your result faster with such a blur range in my effect and "keep original image" on, than having to do these multiple steps with duplicating the layer and separate blur. If I understand your needs correctly (i.e. But if you turn it off, the effect becomes significantly slower. The "keep original image" checkbox is present, precisely to allow this kind of scenario. But of course, the blur only blurs the shadow, not the original image. And you can think of the widening as being (more or less) the same as an object outline. You can think of the widening happening before the blur. As long as widening radius is less than blur radius, you will not get "unblurred" full opacity pixels in your shadow. In the interest of improving my effect for future versions: do I understand that the problem here is that you'd want (need) the set the blur radius to something between 75 and 100?Īlso, if you want the shadow to be darker, one way to get that is to use widening with bluring. then duplicate that layer and adjust the opacity to your liking if it is not dark enough to get the same effect. Or run Kris' drop shadow on a duplicate under the top layer with widening zero, blur 24 then run gausian blur at about 50-75 with keep original image un-checked. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |